U.S. Green Building Council
Search
|
FAQ
|
Contact
|
Your Account
|
Sign In
About USGBC ·
Membership ·
LEED ·
Education ·
LEED AP ·
Resources ·
Chapters
PVC Task Group Resources
Study Database
Outreach Forum
Comments on Draft Report
LEED TSAC PVC Study Database
>
Comments on Draft Report
>
View Comment
View Comment
[<]
|
[>]
Page(s)
Lines(s)
Author
Martin White
VP and Gen. Mgr
OxyVinyls
martin_white@oxy.com
Comment
General Comment. I was pleased to see TSAC appropriately decided that negative credits should not be issued for use of PVC products in LEED accredited buildings. In supporting their conclusion I would comment that the work completed by TSAC is a solid effort to evaluate and interpret a large dataset particularly in light of the fact that significant gaps for nonvinyl products exist.
A negative credit based only on material ignores the most important time in a product’s lifecycle, the use phase and should only be given when no value as a preferred material can be found In many cases, the environmental impacts of the use phase are of far more significance than the impacts of the material phase.
LEED should be a positive incentive for improvement in Green Building initiatives and not lead stakeholders to wrong answers.